Évaluation et intelligence artificielle: défis et solutions pour les enseignantsIA1 et IA2
Par Martine Peters, Université du Québec en Outaouais
Atelier en ligne offert au Séminaire de Sherbrooke (Canada)
(24 novembre 2023, p.m.)
Références
Diapositive 5 : Période de deuil
- Crisci, J. (2023). An important note for anyone doing AI PD for teachers. [LinkedIn]. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jerrycrisci_an-important-note-for-anyone-doing-ai-pd-activity-7128070990684717056-V47e?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
Diapositive 6 : Redéfinir l’évaluation
- Lodge, Howard and Broadbent (2023). Assessment redesigne for generative AI: A taxonomy of options and their viability. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/assessment-redesign-generative-ai-taxonomy-options-viability-lodge/?fbclid=IwAR2IGAAocNIMWoj9AIyBWQLiEIaJP12-9UQCaLQrH7wGp6ugTcfvUGCuE7Y
Diapositive 8 : Classe inversée
- Roy, N. (2014). La classe inversée : une pédagogie renversante? Le Tableau, 2014, Volume 3, No. 1. Direction du soutien à l’enseignement et des bibliothèques (DSEB) en collaboration avec le Groupe d’intervention et d’innovation pédagogique (GRIIP).https://pedagogie.uquebec.ca/le-tableau/la-classe-inversee-une-pedagogie-renversante
- Version PDF en ligne : https://pedagogie.uquebec.ca/sites/default/files/documents/numeros-tableau/letableau-v3-n1_2014b_1.pdf
Diapositive 9 : Apprentissage transformateur
- Moreira, C. (2011). L’apprentissage transformateur selon Jack Mezirow. Fiches pédagogiques. Le Centre d’Information et d’Éducation Populaire (CIEP) communautaire. https://www.ciep.be/images/BoiteAOutils/FichePedagEspeluette/F.PedEsper93.pdf
Diapositives 12-17 : Les cinq choix de Leon Furze
- Furze, L. (2023, October 04). Rethinking Assessment for Generative AI: Beyon the Essay. LeonFurze.com. https://leonfurze.com/2023/10/04/rethinking-assessment-for-generative-ai-beyond-the-essay/?fbclid=IwAR2AovmNzhN94MJlxPSkffge-Hh58PALY-q2wcedRu5uJZnSLO20JPytGTQ
- Furze, L. (2023). AI Assessment Where Does your Assessment Sit on the Scale? https://leonfurze.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/scalePDF.pdf
Diapositives 18-19 : Modèle d’évaluation proposée
- Modèle sur l’évaluation de Peters, Smith et Angelov (2023). http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops
Diapositive 20 : Taxonomie de Bloom
- Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
Diapositives 21-22 : Taxonomie de Bloom
- Oregon State University. (2023). Advancing Meaningful Learning in the Age of AI: Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/artificial-intelligence-tools/meaningful-learning/?fbclid=IwAR3nzsEV0-BTPXTRdgAW6EqcbyL3pWx-LmNfH88fVjew-hZLEMe3-z5Wn1Y
- Stasse, S. (2023). Bloom revisité à la sauce IA. Cadre 21. https://www.cadre21.org/pedagogie/bloom-revisite-a-la-sauce-ia/?fbclid=IwAR1YeXLZLby3u3OWeVArzQUYp2UKWlTgXzLJE9j94PZOYBvdKV6FDoSPhDE
Diapositive 23: Originalité versus créativité ❤️
- Johnson-Eilola, J. et Selber, S. A. (2007). Plagiarism, originality, assemblage. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 375-403.
Diapositive 24 : Originalité vs créativité
- Acar, S., Burnett, C. et Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 133-144. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2017.1302776
- Sternberg, R. J. et Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3-15.
Diapositive 25: Taxonomie de Bloom
- Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
Diapositives 26-28 : Le délestage cognitif
- Risko EF, Gilbert SJ. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(9):676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002.
- Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In: Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Boud, D. (eds) Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4 ❤️
Diapositives 29-31 : Évaluation authentique
- Furze, L. (2023, October 04). Rethinking Assessment for Generative AI: Beyon the Essay. LeonFurze.com. https://leonfurze.com/2023/10/04/rethinking-assessment-for-generative-ai-beyond-the-essay/?fbclid=IwAR2AovmNzhN94MJlxPSkffge-Hh58PALY-q2wcedRu5uJZnSLO20JPytGTQ
- Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2).
- Kashani-Vahid, L., Afrooz, G., Shokoohi-Yekta, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 175-185.
- Wadaani, M. R. (2015). Teaching for Creativity as Human Development toward Self-Actualization: The Essence of Authentic Learning and Optimal Growth for All Students.Creative Education, 6,669-679.
- Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93.
- Spiller, D. (2014). Assessment matters: Academic Integrity. The University of Waikato. https://www.waikato.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/352869/Assessment-Matters_-Group-Work-Assessment.pdf
- Fahim, S. (n.d.). Assessments – Prevention Strategies to Combat Plagiarism [PowerPoint presentation]. The British University in Egypt. https://www.bue.edu.eg/powerpoints-academic-honesty/
Diapositive 32 : Le débat ❤️
- Bauschard, S. (2023, November 05). Debating in the World of AI. Stefan Bauschard. Education Disrupted: Teaching and Learning in An AI World. https://stefanbauschard.substack.com/p/debating-in-the-world-of-ai?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1673728&post_id=138620336&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2fm3lf&utm_medium=email
Diapositives 33-35 : Consignes
- Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. et McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
- Harris, Robert (2015). Antiplagiarism Strategies for Research Papers. Virtual Salt. http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm ❤️
- Cullen, C. (2020). Syllabi Designed with Integrity In Mind. Sur le site web https://www.academicintegrity.org/integrity/syllabi-designed-with-integrity-in-mind/
- Godin, S. (2023). Thoughts on the Manual. Seth’s Blog. https://seths.blog/2023/09/thoughts-on-the-manual/
- Spannagel, C. (2023). Rules for Tools. Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg. https://csp.uber.space/phhd/rulesfortools.pdf ❤️
Diapositive 36 : Consignes pour l’intégrité
- Hough, D. (2023). Examples of Using AI to Support Student Learning & Assessment in Life Sciences. Sway Office. https://sway.office.com/iNhP49DMrhOep2Uc
- Hough, D. (2023). Student Guidance for the Responsible Use of AI. University of Glasgow. Edited by Rachel Heyes. #ALTc blog, October 10. https://altc.alt.ac.uk/blog/2023/10/student-guidance-for-the-responsible-use-of-ai/#gref
Diapositive 38: Critères d’évaluation
- Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education–a systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.
- Shin et al. (2012) White M, Kern ML. Positive education: Learning and teaching for wellbeing and academic mastery. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2018;8(1):1-17. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v8i1.588
- De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Timmers, C. F., Gawke, J. C. L., Schoonman, W., & Born, M. P. (2016). Effective self-regulatory processes in higher education: research findings and future directions. a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 139–158.
Diapositive 41 : Conclusion
- Shashwat. (2023). Is ChatGPT Plagiarism? No. Here’s Why We Think So. Nerd Chalk https://nerdschalk.com/is-chatgpt-plagiarism