Enabling Integrity in Student Writing: How Artificial Intelligence Can Aid without Regenerating
By Martine Peters, Université du Québec en Outaouais
ICAI, Calgary
(March 07, 2024)
References
Slide 5: Who Am I?
- PUPP website https://pupp.uqo.ca/en/home/
Slide 8: Context : two tsunamis : the pandemic and ChatGPT
- Fortier, M. (August 26, 2020). Le confinement a profité aux cégépiens tricheurs. Le Devoir.
Slide 14 : Plagiarism Defined
- Peters, M. (2023). Note éditoriale : Intelligence artificielle et intégrité académique peuvent-elles faire bon ménage ? Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.7202/1107846ar
Slide 16: Hybrid Writing
- Eaton, S. E. (2023). 6 Tenets of Postplagiarism: Writing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Learning, Teaching and Leadership: A blog for educators, researchers and other thinkers by Sarah Elaine Eaton, Ph.D. https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2023/02/25/6-tenets-of-postplagiarism-writing-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/
Slide 19: To Be Transparent
- Peters, M. (2023). Acronyms and Icons for a Transparent Use of AI. http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/transparent-use-of-artificial-intelligence/
Slide 22: The Era of Prehistoric Writing (2021)
- Peters, M. (2019). Digital Scrapbooking Strategies Model. http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/modele-sur-les-strategies-de-creacollage-numerique/
Slides 23-24: The Era of Honest Writing with AI2 (2023)
- Peters, M. (2023). Digital Scrapbooking Strategies and Artificial Intelligence Model (2023). http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/lere-de-la-redaction-integre-2023/
- Bongers, D. (2023). Best 100+ ChatGPT Prompts for Teachers: Enhance Your Teaching Exepérience. https://www.gptpromptshub.com/blog/best-chatgpt-prompts-for-teachers
Slide 25: Learning Code with ChatGPT
- Dougall, J. (2023). Embracing AI in the Classroom: ChatGPT, an Enriching Learning Tool. https://www.ecmtutors.com/embracing-ai-in-the-classroom-chatgpt-as-an-enriching-learning-tool/ / https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/embracing-ai-classroom-chatgpt-enriching-learning-tool-jack-dougall/
Slide 26: Six Thinking Hats Applied to AI2 ❤️
- Mind Tools Content Team. (2023). Six Thinking Hats ®. https://www.mindtools.com/ajlpp1e/six-thinking-hats
- Jin, T. (2023). Leveraging the strengths of LLMs for creativity and thinking. Medium. https://uxdesign.cc/leverage-the-strengths-of-llms-for-creativity-thinking-58137a8da8b9
Slide 27: Chat GPT Cheat Sheet
- Schwarz, C. (2023). Chat GPT Cheat Sheet. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10219009538984455&id=1684067571&set=gm.1330962817844170
Slides 28: AI2 Tools to Search
- (2023). https://consensus.app/search/
Slides 29-30: Research Rabbit
- Research Rabbit. (2023). https://www.researchrabbit.ai/
- https://researchrabbitapp.com/home
Slide 31 : Optic AI or Not
- Optic AI or Not (2023). https://aiornot.optic.xyz
Slide 32: Quillbot
Slide 33 : Chat with any PDF
- Chat with any PDF (2023). https://www.chatpdf.com/
Slide 34 : The Era of Honest Writing with AI2 (2023)
- Dias, T. (2023). These Word & Google Docs Settings May Protect You From ChatGPT Plagiarism Allegations. Slash Gear 21 mai 2023. https://www.slashgear.com/1290480/microsoft-word-google-docs-setting-chatgpt-plagiarism/
Slide 35: Reading for your students or yourself
- Hew, N. (2023). How to use ChatGPT in your assignments without getting accused of plagiarism. Study International. https://www.studyinternational.com/news/chatgpt-and-plagiarism/
Slide 37: For your students
- Long, L. (2023). Acknowledging and Citing Generative AI in Academic Work. Idaho Open Press, Write What Matters. https://idaho.pressbooks.pub/write/chapter/citing-generative-ai-in-academic-work/?fbclid=IwAR1tgfgk0B1RPzlnHeLck3UgWX-VaHGlzf3LPNjLgqF7zggilvN5rSJhOU0
Slide 39: Period of Mourning
- Crisci, J. (2023). An important note for anyone doing AI PD for teachers. [LinkedIn]. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jerrycrisci_an-important-note-for-anyone-doing-ai-pd-activity-7128070990684717056-V47e?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
Slide 40: Redefine Assessment with AI2 and AI1
- Lodge, Howard and Broadbent (2023). Assessment redesign for generative AI: A taxonomy of options and their viability. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/assessment-redesign-generative-ai-taxonomy-options-viability-lodge/?fbclid=IwAR2IGAAocNIMWoj9AIyBWQLiEIaJP12-9UQCaLQrH7wGp6ugTcfvUGCuE7Y
Slide 42-47: Leon Furze’s Five Options
- Furze, L. (2023, October 04). Rethinking Assessment for Generative AI: Beyond the Essay. LeonFurze.com. https://leonfurze.com/2023/10/04/rethinking-assessment-for-generative-ai-beyond-the-essay/?fbclid=IwAR2AovmNzhN94MJlxPSkffge-Hh58PALY-q2wcedRu5uJZnSLO20JPytGTQ
- Furze, L. (2023). AI Assessment Where Does your Assessment Sit on the Scale? https://leonfurze.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/scalePDF.pdf
Slide 48: AI2: Total Generation Activities
- Johnston, J. (2023). AI Assignment Flip – 10 Examples. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-assignment-flip-10-examples-jason-johnston/
Slide 49: Is there such a Thing as Plagiarism-Proof Homework?
- Sidorkin, A. S. (2023, December 20). AI Pedagogy, the Introduction. AI-EDU. https://aiczar.blogspot.com/2023/12/ai-pedagogy-introduction.html?fbclid=IwAR2xNsIp8_dtp8vUHTPc7XAOcEaRj3gWW69R3L2fBNeoqrtreWft50v7UcE
Slide 50: Impossible tasks for AI2 (as of 11-2023)
- Mialon, G., Fourrier, C., Swift, C., Wolf, T., LeCun, Y. & Scialom, T. (2023). GAIA: a Benchmark for General AI Assistants. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.12983.pdf
Slides 51-52: FASTER Principles (Canadian Federal Government)
- Government of Canada. (2024). Guide on the Use of Generative AI. https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai/guide-use-generative-ai.html
Slide 57: Course Outline…
- Tice, C. (2024). Higher Ed Discussions of AI Writing. [Facebook Groupe privé]. https://www.facebook.com/groups/632930835501841/?hoisted_section_header_type=recently_seen&multi_permalinks=934744765320445
Slide 58-59: Classroom AI Use
- Miller, M. (2023). Template Classroom AI Use: What’s Cheating? What’s OK? https://ditchthattextbook.com/ai-cheating/
Slides 61-62: Academic Integrity and Creativity in the age of Artificial Intelligence model (AICAI)
- Assessment Integrity Model by Peters, M. & Angelov, D. (2023). http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/modele-de-planification-dune-tache-evaluative-2023-2024/
Slides 63-64: Revised Bloom Taxonomy
- Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
- Prof Innovant. (2023). Taxonomie de Bloom révisée : verbes d’action. https://www.profinnovant.com/taxonomie-de-bloom-revisee-verbes-daction/
- Oregon State University. (2023). Advancing Meaningful Learning in the Age of AI: Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/artificial-intelligence-tools/meaningful-learning/?fbclid=IwAR3nzsEV0-BTPXTRdgAW6EqcbyL3pWx-LmNfH88fVjew-hZLEMe3-z5Wn1Y
Slides 65-66: Fundamental Skills or Not…
- Sidorkin, A. S. (2023, December 20). AI Pedagogy, the Introduction. AI-EDU. https://aiczar.blogspot.com/2023/12/ai-pedagogy-introduction.html?fbclid=IwAR2xNsIp8_dtp8vUHTPc7XAOcEaRj3gWW69R3L2fBNeoqrtreWft50v7UcE
Slide 68-70 : Cognitive Offloading, Assessment and AI2
- Risko EF, Gilbert SJ. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(9):676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002.
- Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In: Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Boud, D. (eds) Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4 ❤️
Slide 72: Authentic Assessment Tasks
- Fahim, S. (n.d.). Assessments – Prevention Strategies to Combat Plagiarism [PowerPoint presentation]. The British University in Egypt. https://www.bue.edu.eg/powerpoints-academic-honesty/
- Culwin, F., & Lancaster, T. (2001). Plagiarism, prevention, deterrence and detection. Available for ILT members from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a949423f6c0358eda3f919025c7b203955510501
- Gibelman, M., Gelman, S. R., & Fast, J. (1999). The downside of cyberspace: Cheating made easy. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(3), 367-376. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10437797.1999.10778975
- Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2020). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2132-2148. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015 ❤️
Slides 73-74: Authentic Assessment
- Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2).
- Kashani-Vahid, L., Afrooz, G., Shokoohi-Yekta, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 175-185.
- Wadaani, M. R. (2015). Teaching for Creativity as Human Development toward Self-Actualization: The Essence of Authentic Learning and Optimal Growth for All Students.Creative Education, 6,669-679.
- Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93.
- Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In: Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Boud, D. (eds) Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4 ❤️
Slides 77-78: The Debate
- Bauschard, S. (2023, November 05). Debating in the World of AI. Stefan Bauschard. Education Disrupted: Teaching and Learning in An AI World. https://stefanbauschard.substack.com/p/debating-in-the-world-of-ai?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1673728&post_id=138620336&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2fm3lf&utm_medium=email
Slides 79-81: Instructions
- Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. et McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
- Harris, Robert (2015). Antiplagiarism Strategies for Research Papers. Virtual Salt. http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm ❤️
- Cullen, C. (2020). Syllabi Designed with Integrity In Mind. Sur le site web https://www.academicintegrity.org/integrity/syllabi-designed-with-integrity-in-mind/
- Spannagel, C. (2023). Rules for Tools. Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg. https://csp.uber.space/phhd/rulesfortools.pdf ❤️
- Turnitin (2023). AI misuse checklist. Academic integrity in the age of AI – Checklist. https://marketing-tii-statamic-assets-us-west-2.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/marketing/tli_ai_misusechecklist_us_0223.pdf
Slides 82-83: Evaluation Criteria
- Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. et McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
- Shin et al. (2012) White M, Kern ML. Positive education: Learning and teaching for wellbeing and academic mastery. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2018;8(1):1-17. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v8i1.588
- De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Timmers, C. F., Gawke, J. C. L., Schoonman, W., & Born, M. P. (2016). Effective self-regulatory processes in higher education: research findings and future directions. a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 139–158.
DSS Models- English versions
Digital Scrapbooking Strategies Model (Peters, 2021)
Digital Scrapbooking Strategies and Honest Writing with AI (Peters, 2023).