Planning your course with creativity and integrity: no more plagiarism!
References for The Teaching Professor Conference in New Orleans (U.S.)
June 9-11, 2023
Martine Peters, Université du Québec en Outaouais
References extracted from the slides
Slide 4: PUPP web site
- Partnership on university plagiarism prevention. https://pupp.uqo.ca/ ❤
Slide 6 : Context : two tsunamis : the pandemic and ChatGPT
- Fortier, M. (August 26, 2020). Le confinement a profité aux cégépiens tricheurs. Le Devoir.
Slide 8: Definition of Traditional Plagiarism
- Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41-59.
- Kakkonen, T., & Mozgovoy, M. (2010). Hermetic and Web plagiarism detection systems for student essays – an evaluation of the state of the art. Journal Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 135-159.
Slide 9-10: Plagiarism or Not?
- Bailey, J. (2023, March 23). Is Plagiarism a Feature of AI? PT Plagiarism Today. https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2023/03/23/is-plagiarism-a-feature-of-ai/
- (2023, March 27). Is ChatGPT Plagiarism? No. Here’s Why We Think So. Nerds Chalk. https://nerdschalk.com/is-chatgpt-plagiarism/
Slide 11: The Era of Prehistoric Writing (2021)
- Peters, M. (2019). Digital Scrapbooking Strategies Model. http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops/
Slide 12-14: The Era of Honest Writing with IA2 (2023)
- Peters, M. (2023). Digital Scrapbooking Strategies and Artificial Intelligence Model (2023)
- Bongers, D. (2023, May 05). 15+ Powerful ChatGPT prompts to create interactive lesson activities in no time. Book Widgets Interactive Learning.
- (2023, July 12). Maximize Your Consensus Experience With These Best Practices). Consensus App.
Slide 15: Analyze, Use Critical Thinking Skills
- (2023). AI or Not. Optic. https://www.optic.xyz
Slide 16-20: The Era of Honest Writing with IA2 (2023)
- Quillbot (2023). https://quillbot.com/?utm_medium=paid_search&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=paraphrase_premium&campaign_type=performance_max&gclid=CjwKCAjw1MajBhAcEiwAagW9MamBcz5rm-eBdl1DAGny2g7OfYPjJEhzfp4kiQRLMloCBwZvnURuwRoCLKoQAvD_BwE
- Chat with any PDF (2023). https://www.chatpdf.com/
- Dias, T. (2023). These Word & Google Docs Settings May Protect You From ChatGPT Plagiarism Allegations. Slash Gear, 21 mai, 2023. https://www.slashgear.com/1290480/microsoft-word-google-docs-setting-chatgpt-plagiarism/
Slide 21: Planning an Assessment Task that Promotes Creativity and Academic Integrity Model
- Peters, M., Smith, J. & Angelov, D. (2023, March). Planning an assessment task that promotes creativity and academic integrity model. http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops/
Slide 25: Human vs Artificial Intelligence According to Chomsky
- Legros (mars 2023). ChatGPT, Chomsky et la banalité du mal. Philosophie magasine. https://www.philomag.com/articles/chatgpt-chomsky-et-la-banalite-du-mal?utm_source&utm_campaign=socialpilot&fbclid=IwAR2k00YEtjd6loJfJqcNnJb-z_1D-1rkztAKc3UH59jOUwoSOZG9cuoHL6w
Slide 26 : Bloom’s Taxonomy
- Profinnovant (s.d.). Taxonomie de Bloom révisée : verbes d’action. Section pédagogie. https://www.profinnovant.com/taxonomie-de-bloom-revisee-verbes-daction/
Slide 27-30 : Originality Versus Creativity
- Johnson-Eilola, J. et Selber, S. A. (2007). Plagiarism, originality, assemblage. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 375-403. ❤
- Acar, S., Burnett, C. et Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 133-144. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2017.1302776
- Sternberg, R. J. et Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3-15.
- Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
Slide 33 : Types of Assessments
- Macdonald, R., et Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism—a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233-245.
Slide 35-37: Cognitive Offloading
- Risko EF, Gilbert SJ. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(9):676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002.
- Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In: Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Boud, D. (eds) Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4 ❤
Slide 39: Why Authentic Assessment?
- Marche, S. (2022). The College Essay is Dead. The Atlantic, December 06, 2022. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai-writing-college-student-essays/672371/
- https://www.pimido.com/
- https://www.coursehero.com/ (Study Resources, School)
Slide 40: Authentic Assessment Tasks
- Fahim, S. (n.d.). Assessments – Prevention Strategies to Combat Plagiarism [PowerPoint presentation]. The British University in Egypt. https://www.bue.edu.eg/powerpoints-academic-honesty/
- Culwin, F., et Lancaster, T. (2001). Plagiarism, prevention, deterrence and detection. https://www.academia.edu/2810729/Plagiarism_prevention_deterrence_and_detection
- Gibelman, M., Gelman, S. R., et Fast, J. (1999). The downside of cyberspace: Cheating made easy. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(3), 367-376.
- Sotiriadou, P. Logan, D., Daly, A. et Guest, R. (2020). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 45, no. 11, 2132-2148. ❤
Slide 41-42: Authentic Assessment
- Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2).
- Kashani-Vahid, L., Afrooz, G., Shokoohi-Yekta, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 175-185.
- Wadaani, M. R. (2015). Teaching for Creativity as Human Development toward Self-Actualization: The Essence of Authentic Learning and Optimal Growth for All Students.Creative Education, 6,669-679.
- Spiller, D. (2014). Assessment matters: Academic Integrity. The University of Waikato. https://www.waikato.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/352869/Assessment-Matters_-Group-Work-Assessment.pdf , p.6.
- Fahim, S. (n.d.). Assessments – Prevention Strategies to Combat Plagiarism [PowerPoint presentation]. The British University in Egypt. https://www.bue.edu.eg/powerpoints-academic-honesty/
- Eid, M. I. M., & Al-Jabri, I. M. (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: the case of university students. Computers & Education, 99, 14-27.
- Yeh, Y.-chu, Yeh, Y.-ling, & Chen, Y.-H. (2012). From knowledge sharing to knowledge creation: a blended knowledge-management model for improving university students’ creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 245-257.
- Fan, M. et Cai, W. (2020). How does a creative learning environment foster student creativity? An examination on multiple explanatory mechanisms. Current Psychology, 1-10.
Slide 43: Instructions
- Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. et McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
- Harris, Robert (2015). Antiplagiarism Strategies for Research Papers. Virtual Salt. http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm ❤
- Cullen, C. (2020). Syllabi Designed with Integrity In Mind. Sur le site web https://www.academicintegrity.org/integrity/syllabi-designed-with-integrity-in-mind/
Slide 44 : Rules for Tools
- Spannagel, C. (2023). Rules for Tools. Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg. https://csp.uber.space/phhd/rulesfortools.pdf ❤
Slide 45: AI2-Proof Instructions
- Turnitin. (2023). Academic Integrity in the Age of AI Checklist.
Slide 46: Evaluation Criteria
- Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education-a systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80-91.
- Shin et al. (2012) White M, Kern ML. Positive education: Learning and teaching for wellbeing and academic mastery. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2018;8(1):1-17. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v8i1.588
- De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Timmers, C. F., Gawke, J. C. L., Schoonman, W., & Born, M. P. (2016). Effective self-regulatory processes in higher education: research findings and future directions. a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 139-158.
Slide 51: Conclusion For Us and for Them: the Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity
- International Center for Academic Integrity [ICAI]. (2021). The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity. (3rd ed.). academicintegrity.org/the-fundamental-values- of-academic-integrity