2024-09-26 UDEMonterrey p.m.

Don’t Be Outwitted by AI: The Educator’s Guide to Smarter Evaluation

12th Conference on Academic Integrity ‘Resources in the Age of AI’, Universidad de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, Mexique

2024-09-26

By Martine PetersUniversité du Québec en Outaouais, Canada


References

Slide 1 :

Slides 5-6: FASTER Principles (Canadian Federal Government)

Slide 11: Course Outline…

Slide 12-13: Classroom AI Use

Slide 14: Starting slowly with AI2

Coffey, L. (2024). Inside Barnard’s Pyramid Approach to AI Literacy. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2024/06/11/inside-barnards-pyramid-approach-ai?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3AODn6ud4EQOI4srx2fN4K33KwQSHHIL7W3h343VUh6hLgM8oiU6KqTG4_aem_AdmOGXS9vhNBVHHYB8yPH8sxAmLxuR-cuSLRx0sFJvd3TG1Ci2sDl_obkQUjJxDTwGtbWOgyZk8MFcq_rkmYGV0x

Slide 16: Period of Mourning

Slide 17: Redefine Assessment with AI2 and AI1

Slide 19-24: Leon Furze’s Five Options

Slide 25: AI2: Total Generation Activities

Slide 26: Is there such a Thing as Plagiarism-Proof Homework?

Slide 27: Impossible tasks for AI2 (as of 11-2023)

Slide 29-30: Originality versus creativity ❤️

  • Johnson-Eilola, J. et Selber, S. A. (2007). Plagiarism, originality, assemblage. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 375-403.
  • Acar, S., Burnett, C. et Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 133-144. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2017.1302776
  • Sternberg, R. J. et Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3-15.

Slide 31-32: Academic Integrity and Creativity in the age of Artificial Intelligence model  (AICAI)

Slides 33-34: Bloom’ Taxonomy

Slides 35: Fundamental Skills or Not…

Slide 38-40 : Cognitive Offloading, Assessment and AI2

  • Risko EF, Gilbert SJ. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(9):676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002.
  • Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In: Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Boud, D. (eds) Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4 ❤️

Slide 42: Authentic Assessment Tasks

Slides 44-45: Authentic Assessment

  • Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2).
  • Kashani-Vahid, L., Afrooz, G., Shokoohi-Yekta, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 175-185.
  • Wadaani, M. R. (2015). Teaching for Creativity as Human Development toward Self-Actualization: The Essence of Authentic Learning and Optimal Growth for All Students.Creative Education, 6,669-679.
  • Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93.
  • Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In: Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Boud, D. (eds) Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4 ❤️

Slides 47-48: The Debate

Slides 49-51: Instructions

Slides 52-53: Evaluation Criteria

  • Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. et McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
  • Shin et al. (2012) White M, Kern ML. Positive education: Learning and teaching for wellbeing and academic mastery. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2018;8(1):1-17. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v8i1.588
  • De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Timmers, C. F., Gawke, J. C. L., Schoonman, W., & Born, M. P. (2016). Effective self-regulatory processes in higher education: research findings and future directions. a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 139–158.