Intégrité et correction des évaluations avec ou par l’IA

Marrtine Peters, Dolorès Grossemy et Mélissande Trottin

Références

Peters, M., Grossemy, D., Trottin, M. (à paraitre). Repenser l’évaluation avec l’intelligence artificielle: enjeux éthiques et pédagogiques: Correction, rétroaction, notation. Revue LEeE.

Blogue de ICAI Schneider, B. (2026) AI-assisted Grading and Feeback: Why « Approved Tools » are Not the Whole Compliance Story, ICAI Blog (March 30th). https://www.academicintegrity.org/aws/ICAI/pt/sd/news_article/616421/_PARENT/layout_details/false

Addison, L., Ramdial, P. T. et Hosein, P. (2024). An Investigation Into the Use of Large Language Models for Adaptive Grading of Course Projects. Dans. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD).

Aguayo-Hernández, C. H., Sánchez Guerrero, A. et Vázquez-Villegas, P. (2024). The learning assessment process in higher education: A grounded theory approach. Education sciences, 14(9), 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090984

Akakpo, M. (2023, 2023–11–09). Skilled for the Future: Information Literacy for AI Use by University Students in Africa and the Role of Librarians. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 28, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2023.2280566

Alghamdi, L. H. et Alghizzi, T. M. (2025). Educators’ Reflections on AI-Automated Feedback in Higher Education: A Structured Integrative Review of Potentials, Pitfalls, and Ethical Dimensions. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1704820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1704820

Archer, E. (2017, 2017–08–08). The Assessment Purpose Triangle: Balancing the Purposes of Educational Assessment. Frontiers in Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00041

Aviles, C. (2001, 2001–10–01). Grading with norm-referenced or criterion-referenced measurements: To curve or not to curve, that is the question. Social Work Education, 20, 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470120072869

Ayaan, A. et Ng, K.-W. (2025, 2025–05–01). Automated grading using natural language processing and semantic analysis. MethodsX, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103395

Barnett, S. (2023). ChatGPT is making universities rethink plagiarism. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-college-university-plagiarism/

Bearman, M., Tai, J., Dawson, P., Boud, D. et Ajjawi, R. (2024). Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321

Beuningen, C., Jong, N. et Kuiken, F. (2012, 2012–03–01). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing. Language Learning, 62, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x

Biesta, G. (2015, 2015–03–01). What is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109

Biggs, J. et Tang, C. (2010). Applying constructive alignment to outcomes-based teaching and learning. Dans. Training material for “quality teaching for learning in higher education” workshop for master trainers, Ministry of Higher Education, Kuala Lumpur. https://web.archive.org/web/20170918084111id_/http://drjj.uitm.edu.my:80/DRJJ/MQAGGPAS-Apr2011/What-is-CA-biggs-tang.pdf

Birmingham, U. o. (2024). Principles on the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools to Support Grading and the Provision of Student Feedback. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai/principles-on-the-use-of-ai

Bloxham, S., Boyd, P. et Orr, S. (2011). Mark my words: the role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003777716

Bouziane, K. et Bouziane, A. (2024). AI versus human effectiveness in essay evaluation. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00320-6

Boysen, G. A. et Vogel, D. L. (2009). Bias in the classroom: Types, frequencies, and responses. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802529038

Bulut, O., Beiting-Parrish, M., Casabianca, J. M., Slater, S. C., Jiao, H., Song, D., Ormerod, C. M., Fabiyi, D. G., Ivan, R. et Walsh, C. (2024). The rise of artificial intelligence in educational measurement: Opportunities and ethical challenges. English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 5(3).

Cain, J., Medina, M., Romanelli, F. et Persky, A. (2021, 2021–11–23). Deficiencies of Traditional Grading Systems and Recommendations for the Future. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8850

Castle, S., Byrd, W., Koester, B., Pearson, M., Bonem, E., Caporale, N., Cwik, S., Denaro, K., Fiorini, S., Li, Y., Mead, C., Rypkema, H., Sweeder, R., Medinaceli, M. V., Whitcomb, K., Brownell, S., Levesque-Bristol, C., Molinaro, M., Singh, C., McKay, T. et Matz, R. (2024, 2024–02–23). Systemic advantage has a meaningful relationship with grade outcomes in students’ early STEM courses at six research universities. International Journal of Stem Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00474-7

CEST. (2024). Intelligence artificielle générative en enseignement supérieur : enjeux pédagogiques et éthiques.

Chamberlin, K., Yasué, M. et Chiang, I. (2018, 2018–12–25). The impact of grades on student motivation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418819728

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvenment in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9

Chandrakant, N. (2025). AI-powered teaching assistants: Enhancing educator efficiency with NLP-based automated feedback systems. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(3), 009–018.

Chinpakdee, M. (2025). Talking Feedback: Fostering Student Feedback Literacy Through a Dialogic Approach. RELC Journal, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251346206

Chufama, M. et Sithole, F. (2021). The pivotal role of diagnostic, formative and summative assessment in higher education institutions’ teaching and student learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 4(5), 5–15.

Cooper-Stachowsky, M. et Cooper-Stachowsky, M. (2024). Enhancing Learning via AI-Generated Feedback and Resubmission of Formative Assessments. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).

Cope, B. et Kalantzis, M. (2023). A little history of e-learning: finding new ways to learn in the PLATO computer education system, 1959–1976. History of Education, 52(6), 905–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2022.2141353

Cowan, M., Fox, G. et Larson, K. (2025). Can AI Level the Playing Field? How AI-Assisted Assessment Impacts Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Marketing Instructors. Journal of Marketing Education, 47(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241303742

CPNCF et CSQ. (2024). Entente nationale 2023-2028 (FSE-CSQ). https://cpn.gouv.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/2026-02-04_FSE-CSQ_EntNat_2023-2028_A1_ADM_final.pdf

Dadson, Y. A., Mohammed, Z., Hussein, B., Armah, Y. E. et Kumi-Yeboah, A. (2025). Ethics and Privacy in AI Education: Prospects and Challenges in Higher Education. Dans M. A. Adarkwah, S. Amponsah, R. Huang et M. Thomas (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and Human Agency in Education: Volume One: The Nexus Between AI and Human Agency in Educational Contexts (p. 215–242). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7937-9_10

Daly, P. et Deglaire, E. (2025, 2025/07/04). AI-enabled correction: A professor’s journey. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2390486

de Kereki, I. F. et Garrido, I. (2025).  » AutoGrade »: an AI-Based Assessment Tool for Computer Science 1. Dans. 2025 IEEE Engineering Education World Conference (EDUNINE).

Deepshikha, D. (2025, 2025/09/30). A comprehensive review of AI-powered grading and tailored feedback in universities. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00517-0

Dixson, D. et Worrell, F. (2016, 2016–03–16). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom. Theory into Practice, 55, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

Eager, B. et Brunton, R. (2023). Prompting higher education towards AI-augmented teaching and learning practice. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.02

Eaton, S., Mindzak, M. et Morrison, R. (2021). The impact of text-generating technologies on academic integrity AI & AI. Canadian Association for the Study of educational administration (CASEA), University of Alberta. http://hdl. handle. net/1880/113569

Flodén, J. (2024). Grading exams using large language models: A comparison between human and AI grading of exams in higher education using ChatGPT. British Educational Research Journal, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4069

García-López, I. M. et Trujillo-Liñán, L. (2025, 2025–June–30). Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review [Systematic Review]. Frontiers in Education, Volume 10 – 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1565938

Gnana Prakasam, J. et Lourdusamy, R. (2024). The Role of AI in Automating Grading: Enhancing Feedback and Efficiency. Dans S. Kadry (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and Education – Shaping the Future of Learning. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005025

Hansen, G. (2020). Formative assessment as a collaborative act. Teachersintention and studentsexperience: Two sides of the same coin, or? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100904

Hidalgo-Reyes, J., Alvarez, J., Guevara-Chavez, L. et Cruz-Netro, Z. G. (2025). Gradescope as a Tool to Improve Assessment and Feedback in Engineering. Dans. 2025 Institute for the Future of Education Conference (IFE).

Higgins, R., Hartley, P. et Skelton, A. (2002). The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099368

Hill, J. et West, H. (2020, 2020–01–02). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908

Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A. et Hossain, M. S. (2022, 2022–05–05). Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722

Howitz, W., McKnelly, K. et Link, R. (2020, 2020–06–23). Developing and Implementing a Specifications Grading System in an Organic Chemistry Laboratory Course. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12276701.v1

Hübner, N., Wagner, W., Hochweber, J., Neumann, M. et Nagengast, B. (2020, 2020–01–01). Comparing apples and oranges: Curricular intensification reforms can change the meaning of students’ grades! Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000351

Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G. et Boud, D. (2020, 2020–01–14). Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement. Higher Education, 80, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2

Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D., Patra, I. et Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4

Isnawati, I. et Saukah, A. (2017, 2017–07–09). TEACHERS’ GRADING DECISION MAKING. TEFLIN Journal, 28, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v28i2/155-169

Jansson, T. et Löfgren, H. (2024). Balancing diverse purposes in Civics teachers’ assessment decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148280

Jukiewicz, M. (2024, 2024–03–01). The future of grading programming assignments in education: The role of ChatGPT in automating the assessment and feedback process. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101522

Katzman, S., Hurst-Kennedy, J., Barrera, A., Talley, J., Javazon, E., Diaz, M. et Anzovino, M. (2021, 2021–10–29). The Effect of Specifications Grading on Students’ Learning and Attitudes in an Undergraduate-Level Cell Biology Course. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 22. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00200-21

Kelly, S. M. (2024). Teachers are using AI to grade essays. But some experts are raising ethical concerns. CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/06/tech/teachers-grading-ai/index.html

Kooli, C. et Yusuf, N. (2025, 2025/03/04). Transforming Educational Assessment: Insights Into the Use of ChatGPT and Large Language Models in Grading. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(5), 3388–3399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2338330

Kukich, K. (1992). Techniques for automatically correcting words in text. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 24(4), 377–439. https://doi.org/10.1145/146370.146380

Kumar, R. (2023). Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: a case of implications. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7

Lipnevich, A., Guskey, T., Murano, D. et Smith, J. (2020, 2020–07–27). What do grades mean? Variation in grading criteria in American college and university courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27, 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2020.1799190

Liu, D. et Bates, S. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Current practices and ways forward.

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Lo, L. S. (2023). AI policies across the globe: Implications and recommendations for libraries. IFLA Journal, 49(4), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352231196172

Lok, B., McNaught, C. et Young, K. (2016, 2016–04–02). Criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments: compatibility and complementarity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1022136

Lukas, N., Salem, A., Sim, R., Tople, S., Wutschitz, L. et Zanella-Béguelin, S. (2023). Analyzing leakage of personally identifiable information in language models. Dans. 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).

Malouff, J. M. et Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2016). Bias in grading: A meta-analysis of experimental research findings. Australian Journal of Education, 60(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116664618

Mao, J., Chen, B. et Liu, J. C. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education and Its Implications for Assessment. TechTrends, 68(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00911-4

McCallum, S. et Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: student views and staff reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761

Meissel, K., Meyer, F., Yao, E. et Rubie-Davies, C. (2017, 2017–07–01). Subjectivity of teacher judgments: Exploring student characteristics that influence teacher judgments of student ability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.021

Mekonen, Y. K. et Fitiavana, R. A. (2021, 2021–02–16). Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Review of literature. 71, 10–10. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp100711220211766

Mesny, A., Roberge-Maltais, I. et Galy, A. (2026). Innovative assessment and grading practices in higher education: a critical exploration for management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101307

Messaoudi, A. (2024). Les défis de l’IA dans l’éducation : de la protection des données aux biais algorithmiques. Médiations et médiatisations, (18), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi18.409

Michaud, N., Roy, M. et Leroux, J. L. (2023). Les politiques institutionnelles d’évaluation des apprentissages : moteur ou frein à la qualité de l’évaluation au collégial? Revue hybride de l’éducation, 7(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1522/rhe.v7i2.1305

[Record #2356 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]

Morris, R., Perry, T. et Wardle, L. (2021, 2021–08–27). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292

Mubayrik, H. B. (2020, 2020–07–01). New Trends in Formative-Summative Evaluations for Adult Education. SAGE Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941006

Naidu, K. et Sevnarayan, K. (2023). ChatGPT: An ever-increasing encroachment of artificial intelligence in online assessment in distance education. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(3), e202336.

Nelson, J. W. (2024). The’Other’LLM: Large Language Models and the Future of Legal Education. European Journal of Legal Education, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4882243

Newton, P. (2007, 2007–07–01). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14, 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478321

Nieminen, J. (2025, 2025–09–17). What if there were no grades? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-025-09468-7

Olave Astorga, J. M. et González-Carrasco, F. (2025). Evaluative Judgment: A Validation Process to Measure Teachers’ Professional Competencies in Learning Assessments. Education sciences, 15(5), 624. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050624

Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D., Etta, E. O. et Bassey, B. (2023, 2023–08–01). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428

Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D. et Lodge, J. (2018, 2018–12–04). Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: the role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8

Paramythiotis, Y. (2023). The transposition of the copyright in the DSM Directive into Greek law: key out-takes. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 18(11), 779–786. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad082

Pearson, W. S. (2022). A typology of the characteristics of teachers’ written feedback comments on second language writing. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2024937

Pellegrino, J. (2014, 2014–12–01). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicología Educativa, 20, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002

Quesnel, C. et Lacoursière, B. (2024). L’intelligence artificielle comme lieu de lutte du syndicalisme enseignant. Nouveaux Cahiers du socialisme, (31), 119–128.

Rahman, M. M. et Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/9/5783

Rao, N. et Banerjee, S. (2023). Classroom assessment in higher education. Higher Education for the Future, 10(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311221143231

Reis, I. W., Vivanco, A. O. et Ulbricht, V. R. (2023). AI’s role in the academic writing process: An exploration for university students. Dans. 2023 XIII International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV).

Rensfeldt, A. B. et Rahm, L. (2023). Automating teacher work? A history of the politics of automation and artificial intelligence in education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00344-x

Riahi, B. et Catete, V. (2026). Humanizing AI Grading: Student-Centered Insights on Fairness, Trust, Consistency and Transparency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.07754.

Rudolph, J., Tan, S. et Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of applied learning & teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264262

Saragih, E., Zein, T. et Sumbayak, D. (2023, 2023–09–16). Contextualizing corrective feedback in scientific writing through online learning platforms. Studies in English Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.25867

Sewagegn, A. (2020, 2020–10–01). Learning Objective and Assessment Linkage: Its Contribution to Meaningful Student Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081104

Svensäter, G. et Rohlin, M. (2023). Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12787

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P. et Panadero, E. (2018, 2018–09–01). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76, 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Tannock, S. (2017). No grades in higher education now! Revisiting the place of graded assessment in the reimagination of the public university. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1092131

Taylor, B., Kisby, F. et Reedy, A. (2024). Rubrics in higher education: an exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2299330

Thiede, K., Brendefur, J., Carney, M., Champion, J., Turner, L., Stewart, R. et Osguthorpe, R. (2018, 2018–11–01). Improving the accuracy of teachers’ judgments of student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.004

Thomas, M. L., Yildirim-Erbasli, S. N. et Hariharan, S. (2026, 2026/01/01/). Exploring undergraduate students’ perceptions of AI vs. human scoring and feedback. The Internet and Higher Education, 68, 101052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101052

Tierney, R. D., Simon, M. et Charland, J. (2011). Being Fair: Teachers’ Interpretations of Principles for Standards-Based Grading. Educational Forum, 75(3), 210–227.

Tossell, C., Tenhundfeld, N., Momen, A., Cooley, K. et De Visser, E. (2024). Student Perceptions of ChatGPT Use in a College Essay Assignment: Implications for Learning, Grading, and Trust in Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2024.3355015

UNESCO. (2025UNESCO survey: Two-thirds of higher education institutions have or are developing guidance on AI use. Digital learning and transformation of education, article. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-two-thirds-higher-education-institutions-have-or-are-developing-guidance-ai-use

University, M. (2024). Provisional Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI in Teaching and Learning. https://provost.mcmaster.ca/generative-artificial-intelligence-2/task-force-on-generative-ai-in-teaching-and-learning/provisional-guidelines-on-the-use-of-generative-ai-in-teaching-and-learning/

University, T. M. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Learning and Teaching at TMU. https://www.torontomu.ca/centre-for-excellence-in-learning-and-teaching/teaching-resources1/generative-artificial-intelligence/

Urhahne, D. et Wijnia, L. (2021, 2021–02–01). A review on the accuracy of teacher judgments. Educational Research Review, 32, 100374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100374

Vergara-Torres, A., Tristán, J., López-Walle, J., González-Gallegos, A., Pappous, A. et Tomás, I. (2020, 2020–10–08). Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Corrective Feedback, Basic Psychological Needs and Subjective Vitality: A Multilevel Approach. Frontiers in psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558954

Victoria, U. o. (2024). UVic’s Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Position Statement. Teach Anywhere – University of Victoria. https://teachanywhere.uvic.ca/top-post/genai-position-statement/

Vinutha, D., Kavyashree, S., Vijay, C. et Raju, G. (2022). Innovative practices in education systems using artificial intelligence for advanced society. The New Advanced Society: Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Internet of Things Paradigm, 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1002%2F9781119884392.ch16

Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P. et Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z

Weegar, R. et Idestam-Almquist, P. (2024, 2024/06/01). Reducing Workload in Short Answer Grading Using Machine Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00322-1

Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M., Derous, E. et Schmidt, H. G. (2016). University teacher judgments in problem-based learning: Their accuracy and reasoning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.005

Winstone, N. et Boud, D. (2020, 2020–06–16). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47, 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687

Wyatt-Smith, C., Adie, L. et Harris, L. (2024). Supporting teacher judgement and decision-making: Using focused analysis to help teachers see students, learning, and quality in assessment data. British Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 1420–1448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3984

Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J. et Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z

Xu, X., Sun, F. et Hu, W. (2025). Integrating human expertise with GenAI: Insights into a collaborative feedback approach in translation education. System, 129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103600

Yousef, A. M. F., Elhag, A., Hussain, R. M. R., Khatiry, A. R., Al-Saadi, Z. et Khalil, H. (2025). Insights from Faculty and Students on AI Assessment Practices: Threat or Opportunity? Dans. 2025 International Conference for Artificial Intelligence, Applications, Innovation and Ethics (AI2E). Zhou, M. (2023, 2023–10–31). Significance of Assessment in Learning: The Role of Educational Assessment Tools. Science Insights Education Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.co215