Allier intelligence et intégrité académique en ingénierie.

IA¹ et IA²

Par Martine Peters,  Université du Québec en Outaouais

Atelier offert au Regroupement Francophone pour l’Enseignement et l’Apprentissage du Génie (Canada)

(23 janvier 2024)

martine.peters@uqo.ca

---

Références Diapositive 7 : Définition du plagiat

• (2023). Is ChatGPT Plagiarism? No. Here’s Why We Think So. Nerd Chalk https://nerdschalk.com/is-chatgpt-plagiarism

Diapositive 8 : Parlons-en de la détection ❤️

• Clay, G. (2023). The Depth of the AI Plagiarism Problem. AutomatED: Teaching Better with Tech. https://automated.beehiiv.com/p/depth-ai-plagiarism-problem

Diapositive 12 : Nouvelle façon d’écrire

• Eaton, S. E. (2023). 6 Tenets of Postplagiarism: Writing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Learning, Teaching and Leadership: A blog for educators, researchers and other thinkers by Sarah Elaine Eaton, Ph.D. https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2023/02/25/6-tenets-of-postplagiarism-writing-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/

Diapositive 15 : Icônes pour être transparent

• Peters, M. (2023). Acronymes et icônes pour un usage transparent de l’IA / Acronyms and icons for a transparent use of AI. http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops/

Diapositives 16-17 : Modèles de rédaction de stratégies de créacollage numérique

• Peters, M. (2021). Demande de subvention de partenariat soumise au CRSH.

• Peters, M. (2023). L’ère de la rédaction intègre avec l’intelligence artificielle, modèle 2023 : http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops/

Diapositive 18 : L’ère de la rédaction intègre avec IA² (2023)!

• Cursus (2023). Exemples de prompts ChatGPT pour créer des exercices interactifs en un rien de temps (+vidéo). https://cursus.edu/fr/27692/exemples-de-prompts-chatgpt-pour-creer-des-exercices-interactifs-en-un-rien-de-temps-video?fbclid=IwAR2xEUc4DXdLrUsfrxFOKCBb-LfO9vIambCw_x_OCmmv6Tn77DBN6-bTGBI

Diapositive 19 : Les six chapeaux appliqués à l IA2

• Mind Tools Content Team. (2023). Six Thinking Hats ®. https://www.mindtools.com/ajlpp1e/six-thinking-hats

• Jin, T. (2023). Leveraging the strengths of LLMs for creativity and thinking. Medium. https://uxdesign.cc/leverage-the-strengths-of-llms-for-creativity-thinking-58137a8da8b9

Diapositive 20 : Caydee Schwarz

• Schwarz, C. (2023). Chat GPT Cheat Sheet. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10219009538984455&id=1684067571&set=gm.1330962817844170

Diapositive 21 : Consensus

• Consensus (2023). https://consensus.app/search/ ❤️

Diapositives 22-23 : Research Rabbit

• Research Rabbit. (2023). https://www.researchrabbit.ai/

• https://researchrabbitapp.com/home

Diapositive 50 : Optic AI or Not

• Optic AI or Not (2023). https://aiornot.optic.xyz

Diapositives 25-26 : Pour développer l’esprit critique…

• CQ-ÉMI. (2023). Les formations du CQÉMI et de son réseau partenaire. https://www.cqemi.org/fr/formations

• Agence Science-Presse. (2023). Nos ateliers de formations. ($$) https://www.sciencepresse.qc.ca/nos-ateliers-formation

Diapositive 27 : Quillbot

• Quillbot (2023). https://quillbot.com/?utm_medium=paid_search&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=paraphrase_premium&campaign_type=performance_max&gclid=CjwKCAjw1MajBhAcEiwAagW9MamBcz5rm-eBdl1DAGny2g7OfYPjJEhzfp4kiQRLMloCBwZvnURuwRoCLKoQAvD_BwE

Diapositive 28 : Chat with any PDF

• Chat with any PDF (2023). https://www.chatpdf.com/

Diapositive 29 : Détection manuelle

• Dias, T. (2023). These Word & Google Docs Settings May Protect You From ChatGPT Plagiarism Allegations. Slash Gear. https://www.slashgear.com/1290480/microsoft-word-google-docs-setting-chatgpt-plagiarism/

Diapositives 33-34 : Template Classroom AI Use

• Miller, M. (2023). Template Classroom AI Use: What’s Cheating? What’s OK? https://ditchthattextbook.com/ai-cheating/

Diapositive 35 : C’est le temps de repenser les notions de « Plagiat » et de « Triche »

• Duguay, S. (2023). C’est le temps de repenser les notions de « Plagiat » et de « Triche ». Traduction de l’original « It’s Time to Rethink “Plagiarism” and “Cheating” de Matt Miller (DitchThatTextbook.com) https://ditchthattextbook.com/ai/#tve-jump-18606008967

• Collaboration spéciale (2023). L’IA à l’école : qu’est-ce qui est de la triche, qu’est-ce qui est correct? École Branchée. https://ecolebranchee.com/ia-en-classe-qu-est-ce-qui-est-de-la-triche-qu-est-ce-qui-est-correct/?mc_cid=b80d5f0984&mc_eid=012c4053c0

Diapositive 36 : Pour les étudiants / élèves

• Long, L. (2023). Acknowledging and Citing Generative AI in Academic Work. Idaho Open Press, Write What Matters. https://idaho.pressbooks.pub/ /chapter/citing-generative-ai-in-academic-work/?fbclid=IwAR1tgfgk0B1RPzlnHeLck3UgWX-VaHGlzf3LPNjLgqF7zggilvN5rSJhOU0

Diapositive 38 : Redéfinir l’évaluation

• Lodge, Howard and Broadbent (2023). Assessment redesigne for generative AI: A taxonomy of options and their viability. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/assessment-redesign-generative-ai-taxonomy-options-viability-lodge/?fbclid=IwAR2IGAAocNIMWoj9AIyBWQLiEIaJP12-9UQCaLQrH7wGp6ugTcfvUGCuE7Y

Diapositive 39 : Classe inversée

• Roy, N. (2014). La classe inversée : une pédagogie renversante? Le Tableau, 2014, Volume 3, No. 1. Direction du soutien à l’enseignement et des bibliothèques (DSEB) en collaboration avec le Groupe d’intervention et d’innovation pédagogique (GRIIP). https://pedagogie.uquebec.ca/le-tableau/la-classe-inversee-une-pedagogie-renversante

• Version PDF en ligne : https://pedagogie.uquebec.ca/sites/default/files/documents/numeros-tableau/letableau-v3-n1_2014b_1.pdf

Diapositive 40 : Tâches impossibles pour les IA2 (en ce moment 11-2023)

• Mialon, G., Fourrier, C., Swift, C., Wolf, T., LeCun, Y. & Scialom, T. (2023). GAIA: a Benchmark for General AI Assistants. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.12983.pdf

Diapositives 42-46 : Les cinq choix de Leon Furze

• Furze, L. (2023, October 04). Rethinking Assessment for Generative AI: Beyon the Essay. LeonFurze.com. https://leonfurze.com/2023/10/04/rethinking-assessment-for-generative-ai-beyond-the-essay/?fbclid=IwAR2AovmNzhN94MJlxPSkffge-Hh58PALY-q2wcedRu5uJZnSLO20JPytGTQ

• Furze, L. (2023). AI Assessment Where Does your Assessment Sit on the Scale? https://leonfurze.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/scalePDF.pdf

Diapositive 47-48 : Modèle d’évaluation proposée

• Peters, M., Smith, J. et Angelov, D. (2023). Planification d’une tâche évaluative qui favorise la créativité et l’intégrité académique. http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops

Diapositives 49-51 : Taxonomie de Bloom révisée

• Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.

• Prof Innovant. (2023). Taxonomie de Bloom révisée : verbes d’action. https://www.profinnovant.com/taxonomie-de-bloom-revisee-verbes-daction/

• Oregon State University. (2023). Advancing Meaningful Learning in the Age of AI: Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/artificial-intelligence-tools/meaningful-learning/?fbclid=IwAR3nzsEV0-BTPXTRdgAW6EqcbyL3pWx-LmNfH88fVjew-hZLEMe3-z5Wn1Y

Diapositives 52-53 : Compétences fondamentales ou non…

• Sidorkin, A. S. (2023, December 20). AI Pedagogy, the Introduction. AI-EDU. https://aiczar.blogspot.com/2023/12/ai-pedagogy-introduction.html?fbclid=IwAR2xNsIp8_dtp8vUHTPc7XAOcEaRj3gWW69R3L2fBNeoqrtreWft50v7UcE

Diapositives 54 : Taxonomie de Bloom

• Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.

Diapositives 55-56 : Évaluation authentique

• Furze, L. (2023, October 04). Rethinking Assessment for Generative AI: Beyon the Essay. LeonFurze.com. https://leonfurze.com/2023/10/04/rethinking-assessment-for-generative-ai-beyond-the-essay/?fbclid=IwAR2AovmNzhN94MJlxPSkffge-Hh58PALY-q2wcedRu5uJZnSLO20JPytGTQ

• Spiller, D. (2014). Assessment matters: Academic Integrity. The University of Waikato. https://www.waikato.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/352869/Assessment-Matters_-Group-Work-Assessment.pdf

• Fahim, S. (n.d.). Assessments – Prevention Strategies to Combat Plagiarism [PowerPoint presentation]. The British University in Egypt. https://www.bue.edu.eg/powerpoints-academic-honesty/

Diapositive 57 : Le débat ❤️

• Bauschard, S. (2023, November 05). Debating in the World of AI. Stefan Bauschard. Education Disrupted: Teaching and Learning in An AI World. https://stefanbauschard.substack.com/p/debating-in-the-world-of-ai?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1673728&post_id=138620336&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2fm3lf&utm_medium=email

Diapositives 58-59 : Consignes

• Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. et McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636

• Harris, Robert (2015). Antiplagiarism Strategies for Research Papers. Virtual Salt. https://www.virtualsalt.com/anti-plagiarism-strategies-for-research-papers/ ❤️

• Cullen, C. (2020). Syllabi Designed with Integrity In Mind. Sur le site web https://www.academicintegrity.org/integrity/syllabi-designed-with-integrity-in-mind/

Diapositive 60 : Seth’s Ideas on the Manual… ou les consignes

• Godin, S. (2023). Thoughts on the Manual. Seth’s Blog. https://seths.blog/2023/09/thoughts-on-the-manual/

Diapositive 61 : Consignes pour l’intégrité

• Hough, D. (2023). Examples of Using AI to Support Student Learning & Assessment in Life Sciences. Sway Office. https://sway.office.com/iNhP49DMrhOep2Uc

• Hough, D. (2023). Student Guidance for the Responsible Use of AI. University of Glasgow. Edited by Rachel Heyes. #ALTc blog, October 10. https://altc.alt.ac.uk/blog/2023/10/student-guidance-for-the-responsible-use-of-ai/#gref

Diapositive 62: Critères d’évaluation

• Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education–a systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.

• Shin et al. (2012) White M, Kern ML. Positive education: Learning and teaching for wellbeing and academic mastery. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2018;8(1):1-17. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v8i1.588

• De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Timmers, C. F., Gawke, J. C. L., Schoonman, W., & Born, M. P. (2016). Effective self-regulatory processes in higher education: research findings and future directions. a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 139–158.

Diapositive 71 : Conclusion

• (2023). Is ChatGPT Plagiarism? No. Here’s Why We Think So. Nerd Chalk https://nerdschalk.com/is-chatgpt-plagiarism