Naviguer dans le paysage de l’intelligence artificielle avec intégrité

IA1 et IA²

Atelier offert au Cégep Édouard Montpetit (10 octobre 2023)

Par Martine Peters, Université du Québec en Outaouais

martine.peters@uqo.ca

---

Références

Diapositive 6

• Marr, B. (2019, November 11). 13 Mind-Blowing Things Artificial Intelligence Can Already Do Today. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2019/11/11/13-mind-blowing-things-artificial-intelligence-can-already-do-today/?sh=2cbcddac6502

Diapositive 7

• Deligne, F. (2023, 21 janvier). Maux d’excuse. #ChatGPT #dessindepresse. Deligne, dessins de presse. http://deligne.fr/

Diapositives 11-12: Définition du plagiat

• Bailey, J. (2023, March 23). Is Plagiarism a Feature of AI? PT Plagiarism Today. https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2023/03/23/is-plagiarism-a-feature-of-ai/
• Peters, M. (à paraitre). Intelligence artificielle et intégrité académique peuvent-elles faire bon ménage ? Revue canadienne de l’éducation.
• (2023, March 27). Is ChatGPT Plagiarism? No. Here’s Why We Think So. Nerd Chalk https://nerdschalk.com/is-chatgpt-plagiarism

Diapositive 14 : Nouvelle façon d’écrire ❤️

• Eaton, S. E. (2023). 6 Tenets of Postplagiarism: Writing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Learning, Teaching and Leadership: A blog for educators, researchers and other thinkers by Sarah Elaine Eaton, Ph.D. https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2023/02/25/6-tenets-of-postplagiarism-writing-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/

Diapositives 17-18 : Modèles de rédaction de stratégies de créacollage numérique

• Peters, M. (2021). Demande de subvention de partenariat soumise au CRSH.
• Peters, M. (2023). L’ère de la rédaction intègre avec l’intelligence artificielle, modèle 2023 : http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops/

Diapositive 19 : Prompt ChatGPT pour enseignants

• Thot. Cursus (2023). Exemples de prompts ChatGPT pour créer des exercices interactifs en un rien de temps (+vidéo). https://cursus.edu/fr/27692/exemples-de-prompts-chatgpt-pour-creer-des-exercices-interactifs-en-un-rien-de-temps-video?fbclid=IwAR2xEUc4DXdLrUsfrxFOKCBb-LfO9vIambCw_x_OCmmv6Tn77DBN6-bTGBI

Diapositive 20

• Every Child Matters: ChatGPT learning Code Poster https://www.ecmtutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ChatGPT-Learning-Code-Poster-Pack.pdf

Diapositives 21-22 : Un outil d’apprentissage pour les élèves/étudiants/profs

• Jack D (Admin). AI-Powered Creations Corner. ECM Tutors. https://www.ecmtutors.com/embracing-ai-in-the-classroom-chatgpt-as-an-enriching-learning-tool/

Diapositive 23 : Les six chapeaux appliqués à l IA² ❤️

• Mind Tools Content Team. (2023). Six Thinking Hats ®. https://www.mindtools.com/ajlpp1e/six-thinking-hats
• Jin, T. (2023). Leveraging the strengths of LLMs for creativity and thinking. Medium. https://uxdesign.cc/leverage-the-strengths-of-llms-for-creativity-thinking-58137a8da8b9

Diapositive 24: Consensus ❤️

• Consensus (2023). https://consensus.app/search/

Diapositives 25-26 : Research Rabbit

• Research Rabbit. (2023). https://www.researchrabbit.ai/
• https://researchrabbitapp.com/home

Diapositive 27 : Optic AI or Not

• Optic AI or Not (2023). https://aiornot.optic.xyz

Diapositives 28-29 : Pour développer l’esprit critique…

• CQ-ÉMI. (2023). Les formations du CQÉMI et de son réseau partenaire. https://www.cqemi.org/fr/formations
• Agence Science-Presse. (2023). Nos ateliers de formations. ($$) https://www.sciencepresse.qc.ca/nos-ateliers-formation

Diapositive 30 : Quillbot 

• Quillbot (2023). https://quillbot.com/?utm_medium=paid_search&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=paraphrase_premium&campaign_type=performance_max&gclid=CjwKCAjw1MajBhAcEiwAagW9MamBcz5rm-eBdl1DAGny2g7OfYPjJEhzfp4kiQRLMloCBwZvnURuwRoCLKoQAvD_BwE

Diapositive 31 : Chat with any PDF

• Chat with any PDF (2023). https://www.chatpdf.com/

Diapositive 32 : L’ère de la rédaction intègre avec I’ IA²  (2023)

• Dias, T. (2023). These Word & Google Docs Settings May Protect You From ChatGPT Plagiarism Allegations. Slash Gear 21 mai 2023. https://www.slashgear.com/1290480/microsoft-word-google-docs-setting-chatgpt-plagiarism/

Diapositive 33: Lecture pour vos étudiants ou pour vous ❤️
Hew, N. (2023). How to use ChatGPT in your assignments without getting accused of plagiarism. Study International. https://www.studyinternational.com/news/chatgpt-and-plagiarism/

Diapositive 36 : Parlons-en de la détection ❤️

• Clay, G. (2023). The Depth of the AI Plagiarism Problem. AutomatED: Teaching Better with Tech. https://automated.beehiiv.com/p/depth-ai-plagiarism-problem

Diapositive 44 : Redéfinir l’évaluation

• Lodge, Howard and Broadbent (2023). Assessment redesigne for generative AI: A taxonomy of options and their viability. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/assessment-redesign-generative-ai-taxonomy-options-viability-lodge/?fbclid=IwAR2IGAAocNIMWoj9AIyBWQLiEIaJP12-9UQCaLQrH7wGp6ugTcfvUGCuE7Y

Diapositives 45-47 : Modèle d’évaluation proposée

• Modèle sur l’évaluation de Peters, Smith et Angelov (2023). http://w4.uqo.ca/mpeters/ateliers-workshops

Diapositive 48-49 : Taxonomie de Bloom

• Oregon State University. (2023). Advancing Meaningful Learning in the Age of AI: Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/artificial-intelligence-tools/meaningful-learning/?fbclid=IwAR3nzsEV0-BTPXTRdgAW6EqcbyL3pWx-LmNfH88fVjew-hZLEMe3-z5Wn1Y
• Stasse, S. (2023). Bloom revisité à la sauce IA. Cadre 21. https://www.cadre21.org/pedagogie/bloom-revisite-a-la-sauce-ia/?fbclid=IwAR1YeXLZLby3u3OWeVArzQUYp2UKWlTgXzLJE9j94PZOYBvdKV6FDoSPhDE

Diapositives 50 : Originalité versus créativité ❤️

• Johnson-Eilola, J. et Selber, S. A. (2007). Plagiarism, originality, assemblage. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 375-403.

Diapositive 51 : Originalité vs créativité

• Acar, S., Burnett, C. et Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 133-144. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2017.1302776
• Sternberg, R. J. et Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3-15.

Diapositive 52 : Créativité et originalité en éducation

• Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.

Diapositives 54-56 : Le délestage cognitif

• Risko EF, Gilbert SJ. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 20(9):676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002.
• Dawson, P. (2020). Cognitive Offloading and Assessment. In: Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Boud, D. (eds) Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4 ❤️

Diapositive 58 :

• Furze, L. (2023, October 04). Rethinking Assessment for Generative AI: Beyon the Essay. LeonFurze.com. https://leonfurze.com/2023/10/04/rethinking-assessment-for-generative-ai-beyond-the-essay/?fbclid=IwAR2AovmNzhN94MJlxPSkffge-Hh58PALY-q2wcedRu5uJZnSLO20JPytGTQ

Diapositives 59-60 : Évaluation authentique

• Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2).
• Kashani-Vahid, L., Afrooz, G., Shokoohi-Yekta, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 175-185.

• Wadaani, M. R. (2015). Teaching for Creativity as Human Development toward Self-Actualization: The Essence of Authentic Learning and Optimal Growth for All Students.Creative Education, 6,669-679.
• Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93.  
• Spiller, D. (2014). Assessment matters: Academic Integrity. The University of Waikato. https://www.waikato.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/352869/Assessment-Matters_-Group-Work-Assessment.pdf
• Fahim, S. (n.d.). Assessments – Prevention Strategies to Combat Plagiarism [PowerPoint presentation]. The British University in Egypt. https://www.bue.edu.eg/powerpoints-academic-honesty/

Diapositives 62-63 : Consignes

• Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R. et McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
• Harris, Robert (2015).  Antiplagiarism Strategies for Research Papers. Virtual Salt. http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm
• Cullen, C. (2020). Syllabi Designed with Integrity In Mind.  Sur le site web https://www.academicintegrity.org/integrity/syllabi-designed-with-integrity-in-mind/
• Spannagel, C. (2023). Rules for Tools. Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg. https://csp.uber.space/phhd/rulesfortools.pdf ❤️

Diapositive 65 : Critères d’évaluation

• Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education–a systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.
• Shin et al. (2012) White M, Kern ML. Positive education: Learning and teaching for wellbeing and academic mastery. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2018;8(1):1-17. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v8i1.588
• De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Timmers, C. F., Gawke, J. C. L., Schoonman, W., & Born, M. P. (2016). Effective self-regulatory processes in higher education: research findings and future directions. a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 139–158.

Diapositive 68 : Conclusion

• (2023, March 27). Is ChatGPT Plagiarism? No. Here’s Why We Think So. Nerd Chalk https://nerdschalk.com/is-chatgpt-plagiarism